Initial Capital Letter Confusion

Useful places to look up facts

Moderator: Global Moderators

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Initial Capital Letter Confusion

Post by DavidWW » Thu Nov 16, 2006 2:52 pm

In my experience one of the reasons for apparantly missing records is due to the handwriting style - the "hand" - of the census enumerator from 1841 onwards, or the registrar from 1855 onwards (not forgetting the ministers and session clerks in the early decades of the 19th century) particularly as regards capital letters, leading to misinterpretation by subsequent transcribers and indexers.

While sometimes, especially in the earlier period for the records mentioned above there can be an occasional legacy from Secretary Hand, especially in the earlier records, the confusion more often derives from a more personal, sometimes quite ideosyncratic approach to the forming of capital letters by the gentlemen concerned :!:

Based on many years experience, I've compiled the following list.

Note that much depends on the particular hand of the enumerator or the registrar as to which possibilities can be confused. In census enumeration books, statutory registers, OPRs, and other contemporaneous reocrds, study of other pages and records is well worthwhile and highly recommended.

The following confusion in interpretation can easily take place.

L/S and the reverse
D/P and the reverse
I/J and the reverse
M/N/T and the reverse
H/K/F and the reverse
U/V and the reverse
M/W and the reverse
R/P and the reverse
Q/L and the reverse
I as G
P as G
G as Cr or Ci
As or Ar as Ch
Ag as Cl
Cl as A
St as H

Your comments on the above in terms of your own experience greatly appreciated, especially in terms of omissions.

David
Last edited by DavidWW on Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:24 pm, edited 9 times in total.

emanday
Global Moderator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 12:50 am
Location: Born in Glasgow: now in Bristol

Post by emanday » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:28 pm

None of the above (yet) David, but I did tell GROS about my Great Grandmother's nephew, visiting at census time, who had been indexed as Pirtrig instead of Girtrig. It was the only "G" initial letter on the page that had been mis-indexed. Surprising, really, as the enumerator had written the "G" the same in all other instances :?

Added Later: P.S. I've printed off you list for future reference - very helpful
[b]Mary[/b]
A cat leaves pawprints on your heart
McDonald or MacDonald (some couldn't make up their mind!), Bonner, Crichton, McKillop, Campbell, Cameron, Gitrig (+other spellings), Clark, Sloan, Stewart, McCutcheon, Ireland (the surname)

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:32 pm

emanday wrote:None of the above (yet) David, but I did tell GROS about my Great Grandmother's nephew, visiting at census time, who had been indexed as Pirtrig instead of Girtrig. It was the only "G" initial letter on the page that had been mis-indexed. Surprising, really, as the enumerator had written the "G" the same in all other instances :?
Mary

Thanks for that.

From your own reading of that page, did it appear reasonable to you that the "G" could have been misinterpreted as a "P" ?

David

emanday
Global Moderator
Posts: 2927
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 12:50 am
Location: Born in Glasgow: now in Bristol

Post by emanday » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:44 pm

Debatable!

On the same page there is a McGill, a Grain Porter and a few people born in Glasgow.

It could be argued that I spotted it right away, knowing the family names, but I still think it should have been taken as a G if the indexer got the other G's right?
[b]Mary[/b]
A cat leaves pawprints on your heart
McDonald or MacDonald (some couldn't make up their mind!), Bonner, Crichton, McKillop, Campbell, Cameron, Gitrig (+other spellings), Clark, Sloan, Stewart, McCutcheon, Ireland (the surname)

pinkshoes
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by pinkshoes » Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:46 pm

I have an Isaac transcribed as Grace in the 1861. At first glance, I can see how the mistake was made - the I could definitely be a G, and the enumerator has spelled it Izaac, with the tail of the z falling into the letter L on the line below. If not for that, I don't think the z would normally be taken for an r, but I think the I/G is a contender.

Your post is very useful David, thank you.

Best wishes
Pinkshoes

setait
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:21 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Post by setait » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:10 pm

Hi David

I'd add

F/T and the reverse - especially in "copperplate" style script.

All the best
Sheena

AnnetteR
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by AnnetteR » Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:49 pm

Hi David

Just the other day I was searching for the birth of a Robert Keenan - I knew he had to be there and I knew exactly where he was born but I could not find him. As a last resort I typed in ?eenan and lo and behold - there he was indexed as Heenan. I also had a Wilson indexed as Hilson in a previous search. I guess the moral of the story is that from now on I will use the wildcards when searching 8)

Cheers

Annette R
-----------------------------------------------------
Researching in Fife: Wilson, Ramsay, Cassels/Carswell, Lindsay, Millar, Bowman and many others.
In Glasgow and West of Scotland: Aitchison, Wilkinson, Keenan, Black, Kinloch and Leiper.

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:10 pm

AnnetteR wrote:Hi David

Just the other day I was searching for the birth of a Robert Keenan - I knew he had to be there and I knew exactly where he was born but I could not find him. As a last resort I typed in ?eenan and lo and behold - there he was indexed as Heenan. I also had a Wilson indexed as Hilson in a previous search. I guess the moral of the story is that from now on I will use the wildcards when searching 8)

Cheers

Annette R
I have one minor twig where, to this day, I don't know if the surname is Hay or Kay ](*,)

David

Tracey
Global Moderator
Posts: 2617
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:27 am
Location: England

Post by Tracey » Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:11 pm

My Mary I is nearly always found as Mary J
Scotland - Donaldson / Moggach / Shaw / Geddes / Sim / Gray / Mackie / Richards / Joel / Coull / Mckimmie / Panton / McGregor
Ireland and Scotland - Casey / McDade / Phillips / McCandle / Dinely / Comaskey + various spellings

Pandabean
Moderator
Posts: 874
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire - Originally Falkirk

Post by Pandabean » Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:30 pm

One that I found the other day was the letter S and F. I was doing an IGI search for Whitecross and some of the people had it down as Whitecrofts. I know it was the correct person by the name of the wife and children.

Later that day I was in the Aberdeen FHS looking at the OPRs and could easily see how they made that mistake as the first s was stretched and the second was normal.

Edit: Sorry just noticed you meant the initial letter. :oops:
Andy
[size=75]
[b]McDonald[/b]
[b]Greenlees & Fairnie[/b] (Musselburgh area)
[b]Johnston, Whitson, Whitecross, Runciman [/b] (Haddingtonshire)
[b]Rutherford [/b](Dumbartonshire, Airth & Larbert)
[b]Ross, Stevenson & Robb[/b](Falkirk)[/size]