Cross purposes ?Brenda wrote:Guess I should have used better punctuation David, thought that by using bold it was seen to mean that William's age was 25
I know I'm an eejit, but M Smith age 36 on the census doesn't collate to W Smith B 1858 according to the marriage cert?
He, William, would have been 43, why is his initial M instead of W?
The "M SMITH of this census entry is female !, so virtually certain to be Mary, given the presence in the household of "Son" David whose age matches with that known for the son of Mary SMITH and Mary SMITH MS LOAG, never mind the CAW link.
David