Would not a yearly advance in line with BMDs be most desirable? or is this pie in the sky?
An impatient,..............
Thrall
Moderator: Global Moderators
That's always been the case, - the issues being what and when ......., and maybe, to some extent resources and efficiency, as it might not be that easy or the most efficient approach for NAS to do further digitisation and indexing on, say, a year by year basis, compared to tranches of 10 years. Remember that the original project was in partnership with SCAN and LDS, with the latter supplying the personnel (and equipment?) to do the digitisation.Thrall wrote:All the same, it was good to know that a tranch was possibly being considered.
Thank you,
Thrall