related by more than marriage

Share your success stories here.

Moderator: Global Moderators

blueladybird
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: renfrewshire

related by more than marriage

Post by blueladybird » Wed May 11, 2011 8:42 pm

Having been doing my own tree for a few years I decided to have a look at my husband maternal side, when I came across a name I had seen before, it turned out the man Daniel was my husbands great aunt [ his granny's sister's] husband. When I looked in my tree there was the same Daniel as my great aunt [my grannys brothers wife's] cousin. So after 28 years marriage we are now finding more ancestors. Good job we are not blood relations as my son points out. :o :wink:

Alan SHARP
Posts: 612
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:41 pm
Location: Waikato, New Zealand

Re: related by more than marriage

Post by Alan SHARP » Wed May 11, 2011 11:30 pm

Greetings.

At least the unions were not of either first or second cousins, which has made our family research of 200 years ago dificult. [More than one example, in the extended tree.]

On my Maternal side two unrelated Irish families the Hamilton's and the Livingston's, assisted each other get established in New Zealand. While I was at primary school, another house was built on the neighbouring Hamilton family land. The nephew who occupied the new house had, for me, a very uncommon given/christian name.

Imagine my surprise some 15 years later, when my new bride started talking about the retired distant relatives she used to visit when going to a beach we were about to stay at.

It's a small world.

Alan SHARP.

joette
Global Moderator
Posts: 1974
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 5:13 pm
Location: Clydebank

Re: related by more than marriage

Post by joette » Thu May 12, 2011 8:40 pm

I did some tree searching for the family I work for after the boy's maternal Grandpa died.Both maternal grandparents were born & raised in Tullibody & as I have family from Dollar thought "wouldn't it be funny if they knew each other".
After a bit of digging how surprised was I to find that my employer's Father's Grandfather was from Craigie Ayrshire like my GGGGreat-Grandfather-it's not a big place.There was a connection but an Ayrshire one not a Clackmannanshire one- this Great-Grandfather sister was married to a brother of my GGGGreat-Grandfather.
Researching:SCOTT,Taylor,Young,VEITCH LINLEY,MIDLOTHIAN
WADDELL,ROSS,TORRANCE,GOVAN/DALMUIR/Clackmanannshire
CARR/LEITCH-Scotland,Ireland(County Donegal)
LINLEY/VEITCH-SASK.Canada
ALSO BROWN,MCKIMMIE,MCDOWALL,FRASER.
Greer/Grier,Jenkins/Jankins

StewL
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Re: related by more than marriage

Post by StewL » Sun May 22, 2011 6:21 am

Yikes :!: George Baaks who married Elspet Flewker and George Neilson who married Marion Flucker (two sisters :shock: ) their children John Balks and Elisabeth Neilson married (1751) They are my 5th great grandparents. :roll:
Stewie

Searching for: Anderson, Balks, Barton, Courtney, Davidson, Downie, Dunlop, Edward, Flucker, Galloway, Graham, Guthrie, Higgins, Laurie, Mathieson, McLean, McLuckie, Miln, Nielson, Payne, Phillips, Porterfield, Stewart, Watson

Currie
Posts: 3924
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:20 am
Location: Australia

Re: related by more than marriage

Post by Currie » Wed May 25, 2011 1:58 am

Hello Stewie,

They are probably Fluckers rather than Flewkers. If you check the Flewker name on the free name search on SP you’ll find that there were eight OPR births, one marriage, and one death, and eleven statutory births and four deaths. Strangely none of them made it into any census. There are plenty of Fluckers, didn’t they make a movie about them?

Hope that helps,
Alan

StewL
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Re: related by more than marriage

Post by StewL » Wed May 25, 2011 2:29 am

Hi Alan
I think they did :) It's one of those names you have to be careful spelling :lol:
Stewie

Searching for: Anderson, Balks, Barton, Courtney, Davidson, Downie, Dunlop, Edward, Flucker, Galloway, Graham, Guthrie, Higgins, Laurie, Mathieson, McLean, McLuckie, Miln, Nielson, Payne, Phillips, Porterfield, Stewart, Watson

StewL
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Re: related by more than marriage

Post by StewL » Wed May 25, 2011 2:53 am

Hi Alan
I have a few of the Flucker/Flewker BM's it is a bit of a difficult family inasmuch the spelling varies slightly.
For example Elspet Flewker b1704 Alexander Flewker & Beatrice? Anderson/Bessie Anderson in another earlier birth.
I may also have made an error with said Elspet, I may have put her in two families :oops:
I think that I will have to re check this line while I am on leave.
Stewie

Searching for: Anderson, Balks, Barton, Courtney, Davidson, Downie, Dunlop, Edward, Flucker, Galloway, Graham, Guthrie, Higgins, Laurie, Mathieson, McLean, McLuckie, Miln, Nielson, Payne, Phillips, Porterfield, Stewart, Watson

StewL
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Re: related by more than marriage

Post by StewL » Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:07 am

I had a look at this line and did a bit of sorting out, used my legacy programme to sort out the duplicates, I had inadvertantly doubled up with a family.
As for the Flewkers, well, the spelling varies from Flockhart, Fluiker, Fluker, Flewker, Flucker through the generations, with some variations within a family, (but that is to be expected if they can't read or write), then dies out in my line, as far as I can see.
Stewie

Searching for: Anderson, Balks, Barton, Courtney, Davidson, Downie, Dunlop, Edward, Flucker, Galloway, Graham, Guthrie, Higgins, Laurie, Mathieson, McLean, McLuckie, Miln, Nielson, Payne, Phillips, Porterfield, Stewart, Watson