Another to decipher.....

Occupations and the like.

Moderator: Global Moderators

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Tue May 09, 2006 2:10 pm

ninatoo wrote:Lesley, what's the filter?

Well, not wanting to spend too much money on this couple as they are a side branch (a sister of the groom of my ancestor's second marriage), I hadn't looked up census information, and probably wasn't going to. I was just asking for some new sets of eyes to look for me.

But I did spend six credits on the 1891 to find out what it was since David obviously wasn't going to just tell me, which could have saved not only time but money :wink:.

However...now I know :lol: but if you like I will not tell yet, to see if anyone can work it out from what David has said.

Nina
As a basic situation I always direct rather then just tell, so that I'm not depriving SP of income, never mind the great majority of people preferring to find out for themselves :!:

See also http://talkingscot.com/forum/viewtopic. ... highlight= for the last post from Sporran, who is also a SP User Group member :!:

I think that you'd better tell everyone what you found in 1891 since it's extremely unlikely that it can be worked out from the marriage register entry.

David

Jack
Posts: 1808
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Paisley

Post by Jack » Tue May 09, 2006 2:41 pm

David,
Don't tell me he's a Piano Tuner. :lol:
But he can't be... :( Ham Curer?
I give up!
Jack

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Tue May 09, 2006 7:16 pm

Jack wrote:David,
Don't tell me he's a Piano Tuner. :lol:
But he can't be... :( Ham Curer?
I give up!
Jack
Neither!

Let's wait and see what ninatoo has to say when Oz comes back on line in terms of time zones and he/she can disclose the result of a wee keek at the 1891 census .... :wink:

David

ninatoo
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 10:42 am
Location: Australia

Post by ninatoo » Tue May 09, 2006 8:47 pm

Thanks everyone for the assistance.

He was a letter carrier in the 1891 census, though why anyone would have to do an apprenticeship for that job is beyond me.

Nina
Researching: Easton ( Renfrewshire, Dunbarton and Glasgow), Corr (Londonderry and Glasgow), Carson (Co. Down, Irvine, Ayrshire and Glasgow), Logan (Londonderry and Glasgow)

Ted
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Galashiels, Scottish Borders

Post by Ted » Tue May 09, 2006 9:18 pm

Hi Everyone

Yer no gettin' aff that easy -

Would an apprentice letter carrier be a trainee Postie or the equivelent of the modern day courier - or maybe a bookie's runner :lol:

Best regards

Ted
Looking for Allan / Gordon / Troup / McInnes / Grant / Taylor / Jackson from Aberdeen (city & shire) & Banffshire
Alexander / Allan / Stewart in W Lothian
Allan / Burnett in USA and Canada / Davidson & Philp in Fife and Lanarkshire

Montrose Budie
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:37 pm

Post by Montrose Budie » Wed May 10, 2006 11:27 am

Ted wrote:Hi Everyone

Yer no gettin' aff that easy -

Would an apprentice letter carrier be a trainee Postie or the equivelent of the modern day courier - or maybe a bookie's runner :lol:

Best regards

Ted
Not so simple as the equivalent of a modern day postie, as the "carrier" could transport the letters quite long distances, so, in today's terms, as much a courier I guess ................

David
(InterNet Explorer dumped me so I lost my new posts list)