Awfy guid question !!, but I believe that there isn't such a problem with 1841, although it will be interesting to see how many images are less than easy to read because the ink has faded to a mid-brown, and the paper has suffered deterioration so that it's light brown, - not normally a problem when the original is viewed, but sometimes a problem with a greyscale image, which I've seen on the microfilms.
It wasn't as if the 1851 blue ink/blue paper problem was suddenly discovered just at the last minute!, or, if it was, that doesn't bear thinking about as the enumeration books have been around for over 150 years !, never mind the fact that the digitisation of the images was completed many months ago.
As it is, according to the minutes, some 13,000 1851 images, representing somewhere around 320,000 individual records will not for the moment be available.
What is not reported in the minutes but was clearly stated during the User Group meeting, is that these 13,000 pages will be redigitised in colour at some future date. Timescale?, - ask GROS !!
In my professional engineering career I have extensive project management experience, both from the outside and the inside, i.e. observing projects from the outside, well and badly run; as well as from the inside as project manager and just a member of the project team, - in
the latter case both well and badly run !! <g> (and maybe also in the former case ! <sad g>)
I can only comment from the outside and a few "inside" comments, that the release dates for new datasets on SP show every evidence of at best the lack of good project management skills, or at worst, sadly, incompetent project management, if, indeed, there was any effective project management at all.
Had I ever been involved in a project where the completion date slipped by the thick end of 3 years, I'd have expected major consequences as a result, not least the imposition of severe financial penalties, and there's more than one engineering contractor in this country and elsewhere that has learnt that lesson to the cost of their continued existence as an independent company.
There are a number of very well known and very well tested project management tools, such as critical path analysis (CPA).
Another essential part of _any_ project is the setting up of a risk register, i.e. a list of various possible adverse factors that could affect the objectives of the project, in financial, programme, completion date, and other terms.
Such a risk register is not just a list of the risks, but a method of ensuring that mitigation measures to minimise or eliminate the possible effects of the risks that are identified are discussed, investigated, and put in place, and taken into account when completion dates are set.
I'd dearly love to see the GROS 1851 census index and images project risk register, if indeed such a professional project management approach was ever adopted !
David