Post
by Jack » Wed May 18, 2005 12:47 am
Hi Maggie,
More to confuse. This is the John CHALMERS you found born 1860, BUT, he is with his parents in Bothwell in 1861.
--
JOHN CHALMERS
Birth: 11 JUL 1860 Bothwell, Lanark, Scotland
Father: JAMES CHALMERS
Mother: JANET SHIELDS
1861 cens 625-2 Ed 3 p 4 (Bothwell)
James CHALMERS 30, b Bothwell
Janet CHALMERS 31, b Kilmarnock
William CHALMERS 5, b Bothwell
Alexander CHALMERS 4, b Bothwell
James CHALMERS 2, b Bothwell
JOHN CHALMERS, son 1, b Bothwell
===
There is also a gr-son John 2yrs b Bothwell. Though the IGI only seems to have only 1 John CHALMERS born in Bothwell of around the right year.
IF it is the same John, then what is the link between the CHALMERS & LOVE families? The 1871 census may show that there ARE 2 Johns of about the same age in Bothwell.
The GM Janet LOVE also has a daur Isabella (b abt 1835), but John isn't her illegitimate son - she has probably married a James Robertson in 1855 and had 4 children by 1861.
--
1861 cens 625-2 Ed 10 pp 9-10 (Bothwell)
--50 Baird Square, Holytown.
Hugh LOVE, head, marr, 22 coal miner, b Old Monkland
Janet LOVE, wife, 18, -------- b Glasgow
--52 Baird Square,
Janet LOVE, head, widow, 55, housekeeper, b Larbert, STI
George LOVE, son, u/m 21, coal miner, b Old Monkland
Thomas LOVE, son, 13, asst. coal miner, b Bothwell
Betsey LOVE, daur, 10, scholar, b Bothwell
JOHN CHALMERS, gr-son, 2, -- b Bothwell
--54 Baird Square,
//John STARK, head, widower, 44, coal miner, b New Monkland
Peter STARK, son, u/m 19, coal miner, b New Monkland
/Michael McNAUGHT, lodger, head, marr, 40, railway labourer, b Ireland
Christina McNAUGHT, wife, marr, 27, -------- b Paisley
Margaret McNAUGHT, daur, 6, -------- b Glasgow
John McNAUGHT, son, 4, --------- b Bothwell
Mary McNAUGHT, daur, 1, -------- b Bothwell
--56 Baird Square,
James LOVE, head, marr, 30, coal miner, b Old Monkland
Ann LOVE, wife, 22, ------- b Govan, RFW
Hugh LOVE, son, 7, scholar, b Bothwell
Alexander LOVE, son, 2, ------ b Bothwell
Janet LOVE, daur, 9mos, ----- b Bothwell
--
Maybe the nephew John CHALMERS mentioned in the Poor Law record is someone else entirely, and it's just pure coincidence that a John of the same name in 1861 was living near next door to the same person who was a neighbour of his aunt Elizabeth in 1891.
So at the moment it's all a bit of a mystery - well to me it is!
Jack