'Child above or below arms?

Parish Records and other sources

Moderator: Global Moderators

mek126
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 5:45 pm

'Child above or below arms?

Post by mek126 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:39 pm

Hi,

I was reading some of the old parish burial records for some of my ancestors and noted the terms 'Child above arms' and 'Child unnder arms' in some of the records. Are these terms to be taken literally, that a child was buried above or below a person or does it mean something else?

Thanks in advance for your help,
Moira in Canada

Russell
Posts: 2559
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Kilbarchan, Renfrewshire

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by Russell » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:05 pm

Hi Moira

Although I have located over 4,000 relatives in my/my wife's tree I have never seen this recorded and haven't a clue as to its meaning. I wondered if the entries you have are specific to a particular parish. There was no standard entry required and different Session Clerks, ministers, church officers sometimes had rather idiosyncratic ways of recording things. I have access to burial records for one church established in 1797 and the phrase was not ever used there.
Tell us where you have come across the records and perhaps one of the members will have an explanation for us (I would like to know the answer too :) )

Russell
Working on: Oman, Brock, Miller/Millar, in Caithness.
Roan/Rowan, Hastings, Sharp, Lapraik in Ayr & Kirkcudbrightshire.
Johnston, Reside, Lyle all over the place !
McGilvray(spelt 26 different ways)
Watson, Morton, Anderson, Tawse, in Kilrenny

AnneM
Global Moderator
Posts: 1587
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by AnneM » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:07 pm

Could it mean that a child above arms was born but a child below arms was still unborn? Sad either way. What parish is it from?

Anne
Anne
Researching M(a)cKenzie, McCammond, McLachlan, Kerr, Assur, Renton, Redpath, Ferguson, Shedden, Also Oswald, Le/assels/Lascelles, Bonning just for starters

AnneM
Global Moderator
Posts: 1587
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by AnneM » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:11 pm

Ahh. See this has been asked before. No-one was very sure then either.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6778

Anne
Anne
Researching M(a)cKenzie, McCammond, McLachlan, Kerr, Assur, Renton, Redpath, Ferguson, Shedden, Also Oswald, Le/assels/Lascelles, Bonning just for starters

mek126
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by mek126 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:21 pm

Thanks Anne for the information.

Cheers,
Moira

trish1
Posts: 1320
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 3:38 am
Location: australia

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by trish1 » Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:28 am

Google for "child above arms" returns a number of sites selling old coins - e.g. Madonna & child above arms
Google for "child under arms" returns sites referring to "holding a child under the arms"

More supposition from me - could it relate to the age of the child - child above arms being an infant, child under arms being older?

Trish

Currie
Posts: 3924
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:20 am
Location: Australia

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by Currie » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:19 am

“Records of Old Aberdeen” has some of these. A search of the OCR text suggests they are all between page 157 and 164. Most are referred to as bairns, however there’s a 13 year old “above arms” (top of page 163) http://www.archive.org/stream/recordsof ... 2/mode/2up

Most of the Under Arms appear to have cost 6/8 with maybe 20% costing ten times that. The above arms are all over the place but appear to have cost substantially more than the 6/8 rate.

Alan

Currie
Posts: 3924
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:20 am
Location: Australia

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by Currie » Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:16 am

In “An Historical Account and Delineation of Aberdeen”, published 1822, 5th line from the bottom of page 68, there’s reference to “town’s arms” in West Church Aberdeen. But it seems West Church wasn’t built until the 1750s.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=yKQ ... AJ&pg=PA68

Then there’s this item, described as St. Nicholas Kirk: City Arms and dated 1635. http://www.flickr.com/photos/71654172@N00/4725292069/

Maybe that’s the Arms referred to.

I suppose also that under and above can sometimes mean sideways.

Just guessing,
Alan

SarahND
Site Admin
Posts: 5639
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:47 am
Location: France

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by SarahND » Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:23 am

Hi all,
Thought I would join in since I posted that question back in 2006. Sorry to say I never did get it clear, but somehow I don't feel like we have hit on the right answer yet. Have just sent a pm to one of our members who works at the Aberdeen Archives and hope she will be able to find out the answer...

[cheers]
Sarah

mek126
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: 'Child above or below arms?

Post by mek126 » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:43 am

Thanks Sarah for looking into my question.

Moira in Canada