Post
by Jack » Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:10 pm
Hi Rita and Stewie,
It would seem a fair possibilty that they are connected - can't be too many George PAYNE, corkcutters!
And on the face of things the PAYNE family seems be connected in some way to a LAIRD family.
Here's George & Hannah in 1851 & 1861 - you'd need to look at the pages to see how they all fit in.
Your PAYNE families are certainly very near to one another in 1861.
They should all be on ScotlandsPeople, but The Mitchell Library in Glasgow has the films if you could manage a visit.
And if you can, then it might also be worth checking the Poor Relief records for any PAYNEs.
As Catherine (Roberts) Payne died in the P. House there might be a record for her, or hubby Robert at some time.
===
1851 cens 644-1 (549) Ed 6 p 17 (Outer High)
William LAIRD, 58
John do, 15
Samuel PAYNE, 24
Jane do, 25
Jane do, 3
George do abt 1
[just a few doors away is a James PAYNE 27 & Alice 25]
-
1851 cens 644-1 (589) Ed 16 p 33 (St. Andrews)
George PAYNE, 50
Hannah do, 48
Hannah do, 15
George do, 13
Matilda LAIRD, 26
Margaret do, 3
Mary do, abt 1
Hugh PAYNE, 7
Daniel CLERK, 18
William LAIRD, 22
Mary do, 18
Archibald do, abt 1
-
1851 cens 622 (593) Ed 10 p 8 (Calton)
Robert PAYNE, 21
Elizabeth do, 20
George do, abt 1
===
1861 cens 644-4 Ed 5 p 9 Lines 2-4 (Calton)
George PAYNE 56, b Ireland
Hannah do, 56, b Ireland
Hugh do, 17, b Glasgow
-
1861 cens 644-4 Ed 5 p 11 Lines 12-17 (Calton)
Robert PAYNE, 30, b Ireland
Catherine do, 30, b England
George do, 11, b Glasgow
James R do, 9, b Glasgow
Samuel J do, 4, b England
Mary MOD?, 3, b Glasgow
-
1861 cens 644-4 Ed 5 p 11 Lines 20-22 (Calton) - also,
1861 cens 644-4 Ed 32 p 18 Lines 9-11 (Calton) - so either a double entry or a flitting!
James PAYNE, 38, b Ireland
Catherine do, 27, b Glasgow
George do, abt 1, b Glasgow
[just prior to James in Ed 32 is Daniel CLARK 26 & Jane (LAIRD) 28, Elizabeth 4, Daniel abt 1,
and with them is a Jane PAYNE 14, all b Glasgow]
===
Jack